Skip to content
GuideToGenetics

Interactive tool

Genetic Privacy Comparison

Seven privacy criteria, every major DNA test company. Per-criterion factual chips rather than a composite score. The reader weighs each chip against their own situation.

Privacy policies change. The chips below summarize each company's current public stance as of 2026-05-26. Confirm the policy on the merchant's own site before relying on any of this for a buying decision.

Companies to compare

Focus on a criterion

AncestryDNA

Last verified: 2026-05 · policy

  • Can you delete your data?

    FavorableYes (account + DNA results, separate requests)source
  • Is the sample destroyed on request?

    FavorableYes, on requestsource
  • Research-sharing default

    FavorableOpt-in (off by default)source
  • Law-enforcement stance

    FavorableResists; requires valid legal process; publishes transparency reportsource
  • Breach history

    FavorableNo major DNA-data breach reported
  • Corporate stability

    NeutralPrivate equity owned (Blackstone since 2020); stable
  • Data storage jurisdiction

    NeutralUnited States (Utah datacenters)

23andMe

Last verified: 2026-05 · policy

Verify
  • Can you delete your data?

    FavorableYes (account + DNA results, separate requests)source
  • Is the sample destroyed on request?

    FavorableYes, on requestsource
  • Research-sharing default

    FavorableOpt-in (separate from main TOS)source
  • Law-enforcement stance

    FavorableResists; requires warrant or subpoena; publishes transparency reportsource
  • Breach history

    CautionOctober 2023 credential-stuffing breach affected ~6.9M users
  • Corporate stability

    CautionChapter 11 (March 2025); assets sold to TTAM Research Institute mid-2025; service continues under new ownership
  • Data storage jurisdiction

    NeutralUnited States

MyHeritage DNA

Last verified: 2026-05 · policy

  • Can you delete your data?

    FavorableYes (kit + account, separate requests)source
  • Is the sample destroyed on request?

    FavorableYes, on requestsource
  • Research-sharing default

    FavorableOpt-in
  • Law-enforcement stance

    FavorableRequires valid legal process; transparency report published
  • Breach history

    Caution2018 breach exposed ~92M user accounts (emails/hashed passwords; DNA data not exfiltrated)
  • Corporate stability

    NeutralAcquired by Francisco Partners (2021); stable
  • Data storage jurisdiction

    NeutralIsrael (primary) with US operations

FamilyTreeDNA

Last verified: 2026-05 · policy

  • Can you delete your data?

    FavorableYessource
  • Is the sample destroyed on request?

    FavorableYes, on requestsource
  • Research-sharing default

    FavorableOpt-in
  • Law-enforcement stance

    CautionHas cooperated with law enforcement under the FBI's investigative-genealogy program; opt-out available
  • Breach history

    FavorableNo major DNA-data breach reported
  • Corporate stability

    NeutralPrivately held; stable
  • Data storage jurisdiction

    NeutralUnited States (Houston, TX)

Why no overall score?

We deliberately do not produce a single privacy score. A composite number hides the weights we used to compute it and invites disputes that no one wins. We prefer to show each fact separately and let you weight it against your own situation. Read the full pillar at Genetic Data Privacy for the background behind every chip above.

For the full background on every chip above, read the Genetic Data Privacy pillar. For the 23andMe situation specifically, see the bankruptcy explainer and the TTAM data sale.